ArticleCureus2024
Telemedicine Clinics in General and Colorectal Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment delay significantly increases mortality in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2025Pooled it
- Retrospective registry-based nationwide analysis of the COVID-19 lockdown effect on the volume of general and visceral non-malignant surgical procedures.Surgery in practice and science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Telemedicine was introduced in place of face-to-face clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic to limit exposure and spread of the virus. This was an immediate transformation to surgical practice without prior training. Concerns were raised about whether this fulfilled the patient's expectations. In this study, we investigated patients' perspectives and feedback about surgical telemedicine clinics. We also investigated factors that may have influenced patient feedback. Methods We undertook a retrospective qualitative study between June and August 2020 at the Darent Valley Hospital, England, United Kingdom. A well-structured 5-point questionnaire was designed to capture patients' experiences with the help of non-medical volunteers. Patients were invited to participate, either online or through direct telephone calls. Ancillary data, such as demographics, previous visits, and the physician's grade, was also collected. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare variables. Results A total of 198 patients completed the questionnaire (online = 67, telephone = 133, median age 59 years, IQR 44-79, male: female = 1). A rating from 'good to excellent' for 'overall experience', 'opportunity to express concerns', and 'doctors consultation' was given by 90%, 93%, and 89.4%, respectively. About 79.8% felt reassured. Given the option, 63% would prefer face-to-face consultation in the future. Telemedicine clinics led by consultant surgeons had statistically significantly better ratings than junior grades. Conclusion This is the first study investigating patients' experiences of telemedicine in general and colorectal surgery. A high proportion of patients rated a satisfactory experience and felt reassured. The majority of patients would still prefer face-to-face consultations in the future. Based on the results of the current study, we would recommend the integration of telemedicine into future secondary care provision in general and colorectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.