ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Appropriateness of ENT Emergency Clinic Referrals to Enhance the Quality of Healthcare Provision in the National Health Service (NHS).
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profile of Otorhinolaryngology-Related Emergency Department Visits and Revisits in a Tertiary Care Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) services in the National Health Service (NHS) face escalating pressure, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in prolonged waiting times and increased referrals. Understanding the factors driving pressure on ENT services is crucial for enhancing patient care and resource allocation. Methods A retrospective single-centre cohort study was conducted at Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK, over five weeks. A total of 156 referrals to the ENT Emergency Clinic (E-Clinic) were analyzed, assessing the appropriateness of referrals and healthcare professionals' involvement in reviewing cases. Results The analysis revealed 28 distinct case categories, with certain conditions being predominant in specific reviews (e.g., otitis externa, nasal fractures, epistaxis). Notably, 21.8% of cases were deemed unsuitable or inappropriate for E-Clinic assessment. Strategic restructuring was suggested, distributing cases among healthcare professionals based on expertise and complexity. Discussion The findings underscore the need for a refined referral process and appropriate allocation of cases, emphasising the importance of nurse-led reviews for certain conditions and the necessity for senior review in complex cases. Improving the primary-secondary care interface and educating healthcare professionals on appropriate referrals are crucial for refining the system. Conclusion Optimising the quality of referrals and allocation of cases within ENT E-Clinics can alleviate workload pressures and enhance patient care. Strategic distribution of cases based on expertise and complexity, alongside refined referral processes, can significantly improve clinic efficiency and patient outcomes in the NHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.