ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Homebound older adults who live independently in rural Japan: Prevalence and contributing factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional Disparities in Home-Based Medical Care Utilization in Japan: Ecological Study of Nationwide Claim Data.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of a Health-Promoting Program on Quality of Life of Thai Homebound Older Adults: A Quasi-Experimental Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2025Article
- Characteristics of Community-Dwelling Older People Who Are Less Likely to Respond to Mail Surveys Under Infection Countermeasures for New Strains of Coronavirus: The Takasaki Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Socially focused intelligent assistive technologies for caregiving for homebound older adults with cognitive impairment: a scoping review.Innovation in aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Being homebound is a phenomenon of confining older adults to their homes owing to health, social, and psychological factors. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people were requested to refrain from going out to prevent infection. Consequently, the homebound status of older adults was influenced by social and environmental factors, resulting in an increase in the number of homebound older adults during the pandemic. This study aimed to determine the homebound prevalence and related factors among homebound older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, a cross-sectional study conducted in rural Saitama, Japan, included 1,020 participants aged 65 years and above who did not have long-term care insurance certification and were independent in instrumental activities of daily living. Herein, homebound individuals were defined as those who went out once a week or less. The relationships of homebound status with demographic, health, social, and psychological factors in older adults were examined. The prevalence of homebound independent older adults was estimated as 10.4 % (6.6 % males, 13.8 % females). Homebound status was significantly associated with one or more medical histories (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-3.90), no social or family roles (OR = 1.95, 95 % CI = 1.09-3.48), and no hobbies (OR = 1.84, 95 % CI = 1.02-3.34). Establishing social or family roles and promoting participation in hobbies may prevent older adults from being homebound. The social environment, which changed during the pandemic, should be improved to encourage older adults to go out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.