Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38370730›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Use of natural language understanding to facilitate surgical de-escalation of axillary staging in patients with breast cancer.

Neil Carleton, Gilan Saadawi, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Atilla Soran, Steffi Oesterreich, Adrian V Lee, Emilia J Diego

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neil CarletonWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6985-7510
Gilan SaadawiRealyze Intelligence, Inc.
Priscilla F McAuliffeDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.
Atilla SoranDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.
Steffi OesterreichWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Adrian V LeeWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Emilia J DiegoDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.

Funding

Promotion of ER+ Breast Cancer Progression in the ElderlyF30CA264963 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CARLETON, NEIL · 2021 to 2025
$243k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA264963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural language understanding (NLU) may be particularly well-equipped for enhanced data capture from the electronic health record (EHR) given its examination of both content- and context-driven extraction. We developed and applied a NLU model to examine rates of pathological node positivity (pN+) and rates of lymphedema to determine if omission of routine axillary staging could be extended to younger patients with ER+/cN0 disease. We found that rates of pN+ and arm lymphedema were similar between patients 55-69yo and ≥70yo, with rates of lymphedema exceeding rates of pN+ for clinical stage T1c and smaller disease. Data from our NLU model suggest that omission of SLNB might be extended beyond Choosing Wisely recommendations, limited to those over 70 years old, to all postmenopausal women with early-stage ER+/cN0 disease. These data support the recently-reported SOUND trial results and provide additional granularity to facilitate surgical de-escalation.

Indexed as

axillary surgeryChoosing Wiselyelectronic health recordlymphedemanatural language understandingsentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38370730
PMCPMC10871380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.