ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
1.4 min Plasma Proteome Profiling via Nanoparticle Protein Corona and Direct Infusion Mass Spectrometry.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive detection of protein biomarkers in plasma is crucial for clinical purposes. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the gold standard technique for plasma proteome analysis, but despite recent advances, it remains limited by throughput, cost, and coverage. Here, we introduce a new hybrid method, which integrates direct infusion shotgun proteome analysis (DISPA) with nanoparticle (NP) protein coronas enrichment for high throughput and efficient plasma proteomic profiling. We realized over 280 protein identifications in 1.4 minutes collection time, which enables a potential throughput of approximately 1,000 samples daily. The identified proteins are involved in valuable pathways and 44 of the proteins are FDA approved biomarkers. The robustness and quantitative accuracy of this method were evaluated across multiple NPs and concentrations with a mean coefficient of variation at 17%. Moreover, different protein corona profiles were observed among various nanoparticles based on their distinct surface modifications, and all NP protein profiles exhibited deeper coverage and better quantification than neat plasma. Our streamlined workflow merges coverage and throughput with precise quantification, leveraging both DISPA and NP protein corona enrichments. This underscores the significant potential of DISPA when paired with NP sample preparation techniques for plasma proteome studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.