ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Profiling IOP-responsive genes in anterior and posterior ocular tissues in the rat CEI glaucoma model.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The rat Controlled Elevation of Intraocular pressure (CEI) model allows study of Methods: Male and female rats (N=35) were subject to CEI for 8-hours at pressures simulating mean, daytime normotensive rat IOP (CEI-20), or 2.5x IOP (CEI-50). Naïve animals, receiving no anesthesia or surgical interventions, served as controls. Immediately after CEI, TM and ONH tissues were dissected, RNA isolated, and samples were analyzed with a Nanostring panel containing 770 genes. Post-processing, raw count data were uploaded to Rosalind® for differential gene expression analyses. Results: For the TM, 45 IOP-related genes were significant in the "CEI-50 vs. CEI-20" and "CEI-50 vs. naïve" comparisons, with 15 genes common to both comparisons. Bioinformatics analysis identified Notch and TGFβ pathways to be the most up- and down-regulated KEGG pathways, respectively. For ONH, 22 significantly regulated genes were identified in the "CEI-50 vs. naïve" comparison. Pathway analysis identified 'defense response' and 'immune response' as two significantly upregulated biological process pathways. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the ability to assay IOP-responsive genes in both TM and ONH tissues simultaneously. In the TM, downregulation of TGFβ pathway genes suggest that TM responses may prevent TGFβ-induced extracellular matrix synthesis. For ONH, the initial response to elevated IOP may be protective, with astrocytes playing a key role in these gene responses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.