ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
End-to-end deep learning method for predicting hormonal treatment response in women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial cancer.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid ResNet-ViT Framework for Endometrial Lesion Analysis: A Comparative Study of MRI and CT in Endometrial Cancer Classification.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Segment anything with inception module for automated segmentation of endometrium in ultrasound images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) is considered a high-risk precursor to EC. Hormone therapies and hysterectomy are practical treatment options for AEH and early-stage EC. Some patients prefer hormone therapies for reasons such as fertility preservation or being poor surgical candidates. However, accurate prediction of an individual patient's response to hormonal treatment would allow for personalized and potentially improved recommendations for these conditions. This study aims to explore the feasibility of using deep learning models on whole slide images (WSI) of endometrial tissue samples to predict the patient's response to hormonal treatment. Approach: We curated a clinical WSI dataset of 112 patients from two clinical sites. An expert pathologist annotated these images by outlining AEH/EC regions. We developed an end-to-end machine learning model with mixed supervision. The model is based on image patches extracted from pathologist-annotated AEH/EC regions. Either an unsupervised deep learning architecture (Autoencoder or ResNet50), or non-deep learning (radiomics feature extraction) is used to embed the images into a low-dimensional space, followed by fully connected layers for binary prediction, which was trained with binary responder/non-responder labels established by pathologists. We used stratified sampling to partition the dataset into a development set and a test set for internal validation of the performance of our models. Results: The autoencoder model yielded an AUROC of 0.80 with 95% CI [0.63, 0.95] on the independent test set for the task of predicting a patient with AEH/EC as a responder vs non-responder to hormonal treatment. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential of using mixed supervised machine learning models on WSIs for predicting the response to hormonal treatment in AEH/EC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.