ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Graph convolutional networks for automated intracranial artery labeling.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) can cause aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, a severe and often lethal type of stroke. Automated labeling of intracranial arteries can facilitate the identification of risk factors associated with UIAs. This study aims to improve intracranial artery labeling using atlas-based features in graph convolutional networks. Approach: We included three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography scans from 150 individuals. Two widely used graph convolutional operators, GCNConv and GraphConv, were employed in models trained to classify 12 bifurcations of interest. Cross-validation was applied to explore the effectiveness of atlas-based features in node classification. The results were tested for statistically significant differences using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Model repeatability and calibration were assessed on the test set for both operators. In addition, we evaluated model interpretability and node feature contribution using explainable artificial intelligence. Results: Atlas-based features led to statistically significant improvements in node classification ( Conclusions: The addition of atlas-based features improved node classification results. The GraphConv operator, which incorporates higher-order structural information during training, is recommended over the GCNConv operator based on the accuracy and calibration of predicted outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.