ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Improved cancer risk stratification of isoechoic thyroid nodules to reduce unnecessary biopsies using quantitative ultrasound.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Characterization of Placental Tissue Microstructure in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Gray-scale ultrasound (US) is the standard-of-care for evaluating thyroid nodules (TNs). However, the performance is better for the identification of hypoechoic malignant TNs (such as classic papillary thyroid cancer) than isoechoic malignant TNs. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) utilizes information from raw ultrasonic radiofrequency (RF) echo signal to assess properties of tissue microarchitecture. The purpose of this study is to determine if QUS can improve the cancer risk stratification of isoechoic TNs. Methods: Patients scheduled for TN fine needle biopsy (FNB) were recruited from the Thyroid Health Clinic at Boston Medical Center. B-mode US and RF data (to generate QUS parameters) were collected in 274 TNs (163 isoechoic, 111 hypoechoic). A linear combination of QUS parameters (CQP) was trained and tested for isoechoic [CQP(i)] and hypoechoic [CQP(h)] TNs separately and compared with the performance of conventional B-mode US risk stratification systems. Results: CQP(i) produced an ROC AUC value of 0.937+/- 0.043 compared to a value of 0.717 +/- 0.145 (p >0.05) for the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and 0.589 +/- 0.173 (p >0.05) for the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification system. In this study, CQP(i) avoids unnecessary FNBs in 73% of TNs compared to 55.8% and 11.8% when using ACR TI-RADS and ATA classification system. Conclusion: This data supports that a unique QUS-based classifier may be superior to conventional US stratification systems to evaluate isoechoic TNs for cancer and should be explored further in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.