Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38370353›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024

deepPGSegNet: MRI-based pituitary gland segmentation using deep learning.

Uk-Su Choi, Yul-Wan Sung, Seiji Ogawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Uk-Su ChoiMedical Device Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Yul-Wan SungKansei Fukushi Research Institute, Tohoku Fukushi University, Sendai, Japan.
Seiji OgawaKansei Fukushi Research Institute, Tohoku Fukushi University, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In clinical research on pituitary disorders, pituitary gland (PG) segmentation plays a pivotal role, which impacts the diagnosis and treatment of conditions such as endocrine dysfunctions and visual impairments. Manual segmentation, which is the traditional method, is tedious and susceptible to inter-observer differences. Thus, this study introduces an automated solution, utilizing deep learning, for PG segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 153 university students were enrolled, and their MRI images were used to build a training dataset and ground truth data through manual segmentation of the PGs. A model was trained employing data augmentation and a three-dimensional U-Net architecture with a five-fold cross-validation. A predefined field of view was applied to highlight the PG region to optimize memory usage. The model's performance was tested on an independent dataset. The model's performance was tested on an independent dataset for evaluating accuracy, precision, recall, and an F1 score. Results and discussion: The model achieved a training accuracy, precision, recall, and an F1 score of 92.7%, 0.87, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively. Moreover, the study explored the relationship between PG morphology and age using the model. The results indicated a significant association between PG volume and midsagittal area with age. These findings suggest that a precise volumetric PG analysis through an automated segmentation can greatly enhance diagnostic accuracy and surveillance of pituitary disorders.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPituitary GlandResearch Design3D UNetdeep learningMRIpituitary disorderspituitary glandsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38370353
PMCPMC10869468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.