ArticleResuscitation plus2024
An acoustic method (Spectral Flux) to analyze ECG signals for optimizing timing for defibrillation in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combining Ventricular Fibrillation Features With Defibrillation Waveform Parameters Improves the Ability to Predict Shock Outcomes in a Rabbit Model of Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Spectral Flux (SF), which is based on common algorithms in the audio processing field, was applied to quantitatively analyze ECG signals to optimize the timing of defibrillation. With the aim of proving the performance in optimizing the timing of defibrillation, SF was compared with Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in a retrospective analysis experiment. Methods: A total of 56 male domestic pigs, weighing 40 ± 5 kg, were induced to undergo VF. Animals were then left untreated for 10 min, and after 6 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) defibrillation was performed. The respective SF and AMSA values were calculated every minute during VF and CPR. Comparisons were made through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, one-way analyses of variance (one-way ANOVA), and scatterplots for the successful initial defibrillation sample (positive samples, Group R) and the failed initial defibrillation sample (negative samples, Group N) to illustrate the performance in optimizing the timing of defibrillation for the AMSA and SF methods. Result: Values of SF and AMSA gradually decreased during the 10 min VF period and increased in during the 6 min CPR period. The scatterplots showed that both metrics had the ability to distinguish positive and negative samples ( Conclusion: In the present study, SF method had the same ability as AMSA to predict successful defibrillation with significantly higher values in cases of successful defibrillation than the instances in which defibrillation failed. Additionally, SF method might be more stable than AMSA for filtering out the higher frequency interference signals due to the narrower frequency range and had higher specificity and predictive accuracy than AMSA. So SF method had high clinical potential to optimize the timing of defibrillation. Nevertheless, further animal and clinical studies are still needed to confirm the effectiveness and practicality of SF as a predictive module for defibrillators in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.