Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38370312›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Prehospital optimal shock energy for defibrillation (POSED): A cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Helen Pocock, Charles D Deakin, Ranjit Lall, Felix Michelet, Chu Sun, Deb Smith, Catherine Hill, Jeskaran Rai, Kath Starr, Martina Brown and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helen PocockSouth Central Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust, Talisman Way, Bicester, Oxfordshire OX26 6HR, UK.
Charles D DeakinSouth Central Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust, Talisman Way, Bicester, Oxfordshire OX26 6HR, UK.
Ranjit LallWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
Felix MicheletWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
Chu SunWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
Deb SmithWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
Catherine HillWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
Jeskaran RaiWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
Kath StarrWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
Martina BrownSouth Central Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust, Talisman Way, Bicester, Oxfordshire OX26 6HR, UK.
Isabel Rodriguez-BachillerSouth Central Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust, Talisman Way, Bicester, Oxfordshire OX26 6HR, UK.
Gavin D PerkinsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, Warwickshire, UK.
University of Warwick · GBSouth Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We explored the feasibility of a large-scale UK ambulance services trial of optimal defibrillation shock energy for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary objective of this feasibility study was to establish the number of eligible patients and the number recruited. Secondary outcomes were adherence to allocated treatment and data completeness. Methods: We conducted a three-arm parallel group cluster randomised controlled feasibility study in a single ambulance service in southern England. Adult patients in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated for a shockable rhythm were included. Zoll X series defibrillators (clusters) were randomised to deliver 120-150-200 J, 150-200-200 J, or 200-200-200 J shock strategies. Results: Between March 2022 and February 2023, we randomised 38 eligible patients (120-150-200 J (n = 12), 150-200-200 J (n = 10), 200-200-200 J (n = 16)) to the study. The recruitment rate per cluster was 0.07 per month. The median patient age was 71 years (IQR 59-81 years); 79% were male. Twenty-eight cardiac arrests (74%) occurred in a private residence, 29 (76%) were witnessed and 32 (84%) patients received bystander CPR. Treatment adherence was 93% and completeness of clinical and electrical outcomes was 86%. At 30 days, 3/36 (8.3%) patients survived; we were unable to collect survival outcomes for two patients. Defibrillation data collection became difficult when defibrillators became separated from their allocated vehicles. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial of optimal shock energy for defibrillation in a UK ambulance service. We have identified possible solutions to issues relating to trial design.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationDefibrillationElectric CountershockFeasibility studyOut-of-hospital Cardiac ArrestVentricular Fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID38370312
PMCPMC10869912
OpenAlexW4391707515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.