Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38370266›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2024

Robust tests for multivariate repeated measures with small samples.

Ting Zeng, Solomon W Harrar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ting ZengUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Solomon W HarrarUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate repeated measures data naturally arise in clinical trials and other fields such as biomedical science, public health, agriculture, social science and so on. For data of this type, the classical approach is to conduct multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) based on Wilks' Lambda and other multivariate statistics, which require the assumptions of multivariate normality and homogeneity of within-cell covariance matrices. However, data being analyzed nowadays show marked departure from multivariate normality and homogeneity. This paper proposes a finite-sample test by modifying the sums of squares matrices to make them insensitive to the heterogeneity in MANOVA. The proposed test is invariant to affine transformation and robust against nonnormality. The proposed method can be used in various experimental designs, for example, factorial design and crossover design. Under various simulation settings, the proposed method outperforms the classical Doubly Multivariate Model and Multivariate Mixed Model proposed elsewhere, especially for unbalanced sample sizes with heteroscedasticity. The applications of the proposed method are illustrated with ophthalmology data in factorial and crossover designs. The proposed method successfully identified and validated a significant main effect and demonstrated that univariate analysis could be oversensitive to small but clinically unimportant interactions.

Indexed as

affine invariancefinite sample approximationheteroscedasticitynonnormalityWilks' lambda

Identifiers

PMID38370266
PMCPMC10868466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.