Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38370220›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Random forest regression for prediction of Covid-19 daily cases and deaths in Turkey.

Figen Özen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Figen ÖzenDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Haliç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During pandemic periods, there is an intense flow of patients to hospitals. Depending on the disease, many patients may require hospitalization. In some cases, these patients must be taken to intensive care units and emergency interventions must be performed. However, finding a sufficient number of hospital beds or intensive care units during pandemic periods poses a big problem. In these periods, fast and effective planning is more important than ever. Another problem experienced during pandemic periods is the burial of the dead in case the number of deaths increases. This is also a situation that requires due planning. We can learn some lessons from Covid 19 pandemic and be prepared for the future ones. In this paper, statistical properties of the daily cases and daily deaths in Turkey, which is one of the most affected countries by the pandemic in the World, are studied. It is found that the characteristics are nonstationary. Then, random forest regression is applied to predict Covid-19 daily cases and deaths. In addition, seven other machine learning models, namely bagging, AdaBoost, gradient boosting, XGBoost, decision tree, LSTM and ARIMA regressors are built for comparison. The performance of the models are measured using accuracy, coefficient of variation, root-mean-square score and relative error metrics. When random forest regressors are employed, test data related to daily cases are predicted with an accuracy of 92.30% and with an r

Indexed as

ARIMABagging regressorBoosting regressorCovid-19 pandemicEnsemble learningLSTMMachine learningRandom forest regressor

Identifiers

PMID38370220
PMCPMC10869860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.