ArticleHeliyon2024
Environmental regulations and agricultural carbon emissions efficiency: Evidence from rural China.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the spatiotemporal evolution and spatial correlation network characteristics of cultivated land carbon emissions in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanisms by which environmental regulation and social network embeddedness influence farmers' ecological efficiency.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Spatial association network structure of agricultural carbon emission efficiency in Chinese cities and its driving factors.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- How can rural digitalization improve agricultural green total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from counties in China.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reducing carbon emissions while maintaining simultaneous economic growth has been the focus of agricultural and environmental management research in recent times. To examine the influence of agricultural environmental regulations and related factors on agricultural carbon emissions efficiency, the entropy method was utilized to weigh each index and develop an index system for evaluating agricultural environmental regulations. This study utilizes the Super Slacked-Based Measure model that takes into account undesirable outputs. The research data used spans the years 2010-2019 and covers 31 provinces in China to calculate the efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions. A spatial Durbin model was employed to investigate the influence of environmental regulations and other influential factors on the efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions. The efficiency levels in the eastern region of China have consistently exceeded the national average, whereas the central region has demonstrated the lowest efficiency levels across the nation. Both the efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions and the intensity of agri-environmental regulations measured in this paper are strongly spatially autocorrelated between provinces. The environmental regulations index on local agricultural carbon emissions efficiency is significantly positive, while the effect on the agricultural carbon emissions efficiency in adjacent areas is not significant. Overall, agricultural environmental regulations effectively enhance agricultural carbon emissions efficiency, which in turn promotes technological innovation and economic growth. At the same time, local governments should actively adopt targeted strategies based on the actual situation of different regions in terms of their resource endowments and differences in the production characteristics of different crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.