ArticleHealthcare technology letters2024
Parameter estimation of a model describing the human fingers.
Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A framework for quantifying the mechanics of dexterous grasp.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Parameter estimation of a model describing the human fingers.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
- In-Vivo Hand Mass Determination and an Anthropometric Investigation on Segment Length and Radius for Prosthetic Segment Design.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is twofold: firstly, to provide a novel mathematical model that describes the kinematic chain of motion of the human fingers based on Lagrangian mechanics with four degrees of freedom and secondly, to estimate the model parameters using data from able-bodied individuals. In the literature there are a variety of mathematical models that have been developed to describe the motion of the human finger. These models offer little to no information on the underlying mechanisms or corresponding equations of motion. Furthermore, these models do not provide information as to how they scale with different anthropometries. The data used here is generated using an experimental procedure that considers the free response motion of each finger segment with data captured via a motion capture system. The angular data collected are then filtered and fitted to a linear second-order differential approximation of the equations of motion. The results of the study show that the free response motion of the segments is underdamped across flexion/extension and ad/abduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.