Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38370076›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2024

In vitro gastrointestinal digestion methods of carbohydrate-rich foods.

Rebeca Dávila León, Marcela González-Vázquez, Karen Estefania Lima-Villegas, Rosalva Mora-Escobedo, Georgina Calderón-Domínguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomimic models forFood chemistry: X · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Current research in food science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebeca Dávila LeónEscuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas Instituto Politécnico Nacional Ciudad de México Mexico.
Marcela González-VázquezEscuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas Instituto Politécnico Nacional Ciudad de México Mexico.
Karen Estefania Lima-VillegasEscuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas Instituto Politécnico Nacional Ciudad de México Mexico.
Rosalva Mora-EscobedoEscuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas Instituto Politécnico Nacional Ciudad de México Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-1187
Georgina Calderón-DomínguezEscuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas Instituto Politécnico Nacional Ciudad de México Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6468-5289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trend toward healthier food products has led to an increase in the research of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion methods. Among the most used models, static models are the simplest. Most static models have three stages: oral, gastric, and intestinal, simulating the enzymatic, electrolyte, pH, temperature, and bile salt conditions. The studies that have taken the most notice are those related to antioxidant activity, followed by those dealing with proteins and carbohydrates using most of them static in vitro digestion models. The number of these studies has increased over the years, passing from 45 to 415 in a 10-year period (2012-2023) and showing an interest in knowing the impact of food on human health. Nevertheless, published papers report different methodologies and analytical approaches. This review discusses the similarities and differences between the published static in vitro gastrointestinal digestion methods, with a focus on carbohydrates, finding that the most used protocol is Infogest, but with differences, mainly in the type of enzymes and their activity. Regarding in vitro gastrointestinal digestion of carbohydrates, many of the published studies are related to food and biomacromolecules, being the oral phase the most omitted, while the intestinal phase in the most diverse. Other methodologies to study the intestinal phase have been recommended, but the number of in vitro digestion studies using these methodologies (RSIE and BBMV) is still scarce but could represent a good alternative to analyze carbohydrates foods when combining with Infogest. More studies are required in this area.

Indexed as

carbohydratesInfogestin vitro digestion methodsRSIEstatic methods

Identifiers

PMID38370076
PMCPMC10867469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.