Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38370074›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2024

Online ethnography of breastfeeding discussions in social networking sites for Hong Kong mothers.

Toma Chun Yip Wong, Karene Hoi Ting Yeung, Venera R Khalikova, Lai Ling Hui, Ka Ming Chow, Esther Yuet Ying Lau, E Anthony S Nelson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Toma Chun Yip WongDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong New Territories Hong Kong.
Karene Hoi Ting YeungDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong New Territories Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-7935
Venera R KhalikovaDepartment of Anthropology The Chinese University of Hong Kong New Territories Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6530-6866
Lai Ling HuiDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong New Territories Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0688-3329
Ka Ming ChowThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong New Territories Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7442-5197
Esther Yuet Ying LauDepartment of Psychology The Education University of Hong Kong New Territories Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0324-891X
E Anthony S NelsonDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong New Territories Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2521-3403
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKEducation University of Hong Kong · HKHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growth of social networking, parents are increasingly sharing their experiences and opinions or seeking help with childcare through online platforms. This study explored breastfeeding-related topics that Hong Kong mothers raise on social networking sites and how other mothers respond; and how these sites could be a facilitator or barrier to breastfeeding. An online ethnographic approach was used to collect breastfeeding-related discussions (posts and responses) among mothers from three sources: two closed moderated Facebook groups with more than 1000 members, and one open unmoderated forum (Baby Kingdom) (26 December 2021-26 May 2022). Posts not related to breastfeeding (e.g., about formula feeding only) were excluded. Data were collected by a nonparticipatory approach to avoid disrupting the dynamics of the groups. In total, 131 original posts and their 802 responses were collected, of which the common topics discussed were breastfeeding technique, breastfeeding-related health issues, breastfeeding mothers returning to work, and COVID-19 vaccination/infection during breastfeeding. The responses to the queries on breastfeeding technique and health issues in the closed groups were mostly about sharing breastfeeding knowledge and health information to provide timely emotional support and practical solutions. Although similar responses were observed in the open forum, sharing experiences in using formula milk were frequently observed in the responses to posts related to breastfeeding. Social networking sites could be facilitators and barriers to breastfeeding. The potential for infant formula promotion in open forums requires further monitoring and evaluation. Moderation and support from trained professionals or peers could be important.

Indexed as

breastfeedingHong Kongonline ethnographysocial networking sites

Identifiers

PMID38370074
PMCPMC10867471
OpenAlexW4388865068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.