ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Humans in the loop: Community science and machine learning synergies for overcoming herbarium digitization bottlenecks.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hespi: a pipeline for automatically detecting information from herbarium specimen sheets.Bioscience · 2025Article
- SpeciMate: Improving metadata extraction from digitised biological specimens.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Herbarium collections remain essential in the age of community science.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Humans in the loop: Community science and machine learning synergies for overcoming herbarium digitization bottlenecks.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
- Ensemble automated approaches for producing high-quality herbarium digital records.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Among the slowest steps in the digitization of natural history collections is converting imaged labels into digital text. We present here a working solution to overcome this long-recognized efficiency bottleneck that leverages synergies between community science efforts and machine learning approaches. Methods: We present two new semi-automated services. The first detects and classifies typewritten, handwritten, or mixed labels from herbarium sheets. The second uses a workflow tuned for specimen labels to label text using optical character recognition (OCR). The label finder and classifier was built via humans-in-the-loop processes that utilize the community science Notes from Nature platform to develop training and validation data sets to feed into a machine learning pipeline. Results: Our results showcase a >93% success rate for finding and classifying main labels. The OCR pipeline optimizes pre-processing, multiple OCR engines, and post-processing steps, including an alignment approach borrowed from molecular systematics. This pipeline yields >4-fold reductions in errors compared to off-the-shelf open-source solutions. The OCR workflow also allows human validation using a custom Notes from Nature tool. Discussion: Our work showcases a usable set of tools for herbarium digitization including a custom-built web application that is freely accessible. Further work to better integrate these services into existing toolkits can support broad community use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.