Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38369981›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Humans in the loop: Community science and machine learning synergies for overcoming herbarium digitization bottlenecks.

Robert Guralnick, Raphael LaFrance, Michael Denslow, Samantha Blickhan, Mark Bouslog, Sean Miller, Jenn Yost, Jason Best, Deborah L Paul, Elizabeth Ellwood and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Robert GuralnickFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-1504
Raphael LaFranceFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.
Michael DenslowFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.
Samantha BlickhanThe Adler Planetarium Chicago Illinois USA.
Mark BouslogThe Adler Planetarium Chicago Illinois USA.
Sean MillerThe Adler Planetarium Chicago Illinois USA.
Jenn YostCalifornia Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo California USA.
Jason BestBotanical Research Institute of Texas and Fort Worth Botanic Garden Fort Worth Texas USA.
Deborah L PaulPrairie Research Institute University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Champaign Illinois USA.
Elizabeth EllwoodFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-1917
Edward GilbertArizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.
Julie AllenDepartment of Biological Sciences Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: Among the slowest steps in the digitization of natural history collections is converting imaged labels into digital text. We present here a working solution to overcome this long-recognized efficiency bottleneck that leverages synergies between community science efforts and machine learning approaches. Methods: We present two new semi-automated services. The first detects and classifies typewritten, handwritten, or mixed labels from herbarium sheets. The second uses a workflow tuned for specimen labels to label text using optical character recognition (OCR). The label finder and classifier was built via humans-in-the-loop processes that utilize the community science Notes from Nature platform to develop training and validation data sets to feed into a machine learning pipeline. Results: Our results showcase a >93% success rate for finding and classifying main labels. The OCR pipeline optimizes pre-processing, multiple OCR engines, and post-processing steps, including an alignment approach borrowed from molecular systematics. This pipeline yields >4-fold reductions in errors compared to off-the-shelf open-source solutions. The OCR workflow also allows human validation using a custom Notes from Nature tool. Discussion: Our work showcases a usable set of tools for herbarium digitization including a custom-built web application that is freely accessible. Further work to better integrate these services into existing toolkits can support broad community use.

Indexed as

citizen sciencedigitizationhumans in the loopmachine learningnatural history collectionsNotes from Natureobject classificationobject detectionOCR

Identifiers

PMID38369981
PMCPMC10873811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.