ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2024
Data-driven disease progression model of Parkinson's disease and effect of sex and genetic variants.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Novel Machine Learning Method for Estimation of Life-Long Chronic Disease Progression and Its Application to Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical and translational science · 2025Trial
- Longitudinal dynamics of clinical and neurophysiological changes in parkinson's disease over four and a half years.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging-based data-driven subtypes of spatiotemporal atrophy due to Parkinson's disease.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Identifying key covariates of clinical outcomes for critically ill patients with Parkinson's disease: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Data-driven disease progression model of Parkinson's disease and effect of sex and genetic variants.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As Parkinson's disease (PD) progresses, there are multiple biomarker changes, and sex and genetic variants may influence the rate of progression. Data-driven, long-term disease progression model analysis may provide precise knowledge of the relationships between these risk factors and progression and would allow for the selection of appropriate diagnosis and treatment according to disease progression. To construct a long-term disease progression model of PD based on multiple biomarkers and evaluate the effects of sex and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) mutations, a technique derived from the nonlinear mixed-effects model (Statistical Restoration of Fragmented Time course [SReFT]) was applied to datasets of patients provided by the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative. Four biomarkers, including the Unified PD Rating Scale, were used, and a covariate analysis was performed to investigate the effects of sex and LRRK2-related mutations. A model of disease progression over ~30 years was successfully developed using patient data with a median of 6 years. Covariate analysis suggested that female sex and LRRK2 G2019S mutations were associated with 21.6% and 25.4% significantly slower progression, respectively. LRRK2 rs76904798 mutation also tended to delay disease progression by 10.4% but the difference was not significant. In conclusion, a long-term PD progression model was successfully constructed using SReFT from relatively short-term individual patient observations and depicted nonlinear changes in relevant biomarkers and their covariates, including sex and genetic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.