Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38369595›Full record

Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Text neck is not associated with neck and upper limb disability in young adults who use smartphones.

Vitor Kinoshita Souza, Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider, Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca, Heloyse Uliam Kuriki, Alexandre Márcio Marcolino, Rafael Inácio Barbosa

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Text neck syndrome and manual dexterity in university students: a cross-sectional study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vitor Kinoshita SouzaPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, Federal University of Santa Catarina (LARAL/UFSC), Rua Pedro João Pereira 150, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, CEP 88905-120, Brazil. vitorks@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8669-2586
Ione Jayce Ceola SchneiderPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, Federal University of Santa Catarina (LARAL/UFSC), Rua Pedro João Pereira 150, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Marisa de Cássia Registro FonsecaPost-Graduate Program in Functional Rehabilitation and Performance, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Heloyse Uliam KurikiPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, Federal University of Santa Catarina (LARAL/UFSC), Rua Pedro João Pereira 150, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Alexandre Márcio MarcolinoPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, Federal University of Santa Catarina (LARAL/UFSC), Rua Pedro João Pereira 150, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Rafael Inácio BarbosaPost-Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, Federal University of Santa Catarina (LARAL/UFSC), Rua Pedro João Pereira 150, Araranguá, Santa Catarina, CEP 88905-120, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of the present study was to correlate neck and upper-limb disabilities with neck flexion in university students who are smartphone users. While handling smartphones, a posture with sustained neck flexion known as "Text Neck" is usually adopted, and some authors related to musculoskeletal symptoms on the neck and the upper limb. However, recent studies state that such an association is questionable.

methodsThis is an observational study when evaluating 192 university students through questionnaires such as the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), besides the maximal neck flexion, grip and lateral pinch strength of the participants.

resultsThe sociodemographic questionnaire demonstrated that most participants had used the device for 5 to 10 years, for five or more hours per day. The DASH questionnaire scores presented an average of 7.2 points, while the data regarding grip and lateral pinch strength showed averages of 29.5 kgf and 8.8 kgf, respectively. The NDI questionnaire scores presented an average of 10.5. The average range of motion of the maximum neck flexion was 27°.

conclusionThere was no association between neck flexion with the DASH and NDI or the grip and lateral pinch strength after the correlation and binary logistic regression analyses. The results show that the scores of DASH, NDI, hand grip and lateral pinch strength, have no association with the maximum neck flexion.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthSmartphoneDisability EvaluationHandHumansShoulderUpper ExtremityYoung AdultGripPinchSmartphoneText neckUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID38369595
OpenAlexW4391917605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.