Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38369582›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Preliminary validation of the Mental Health Test in a psychiatric sample.

Virág Zábó, Dávid Erát, Xenia Gonda, Judit Harangozó, Máté Iváncsics, Ágnes Vincze, Judit Farkas, Gábor Balogh, Attila Oláh, Szabolcs Kéri and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Virág ZábóDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dávid ErátDepartment of Sociology, Institute of Social and Media Studies, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Xenia GondaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. gonda.xenia@semmelweis.hu.
Judit HarangozóCommunity Psychiatry Centre, Semmelweis University - Awakenings Foundation, Budapest, Hungary.
Máté IváncsicsNational Institute of Mental Health, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Nyírő Gyula Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Ágnes VinczeDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Judit FarkasInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor BaloghNational Institute of Mental Health, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Nyírő Gyula Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila OláhInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Szabolcs KériNational Institute of Mental Health, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Nyírő Gyula Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
György Purebl *Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
András Vargha *Person- and Family-Oriented Health Science Research Group, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

New National Excellence Programme of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the resources of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund ÚNKP-22-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assist psychiatrists and clinical psychologists to assess their patients' psychological immune competence-based capacities and resources, depending on the mental health disorder diagnosis and the severity of the symptoms, the present study examined the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Test in a psychiatric sample. The research was carried out in four Hungarian healthcare facilities using a cross-sectional design. A total of 331 patients (140 male, 188 female, and 3 who preferred not to disclose their gender) completed the Mental Health Test, six well-being and mental health measures, and the Symptom Checklist-90. Psychiatrists and clinical psychologists reported the mental disorder status of each participant. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit of the five-factor model to the data for the clinical version of the Mental Health Test (CFI = 0.972, RMSEA = 0.034). High internal consistency coefficients (α: 0.70-0.84; ω: 0.71-0.85) and excellent external and content validity were reported. The test is not sensitive to sociodemographic indicators but is sensitive to the correlates of well-being and to the symptoms of different types of mental disorders. Our preliminary findings suggest that the Mental Health Test is a suitable measure for assessing mental health capacities and resources in psychiatric samples.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychotic DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesMaintainable Positive Mental Health TheoryMental disordersMental healthMental health measuresMental Health Test

Identifiers

PMID38369582
PMCPMC10874926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.