ArticleScientific reports2024
Association between the surgical approach and prognosis of spontaneous supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between surgical approach and prognosis in patients with spontaneous supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage is unclear. We aimed to explore the association between surgical approach and prognosis in these patients. A retrospective cohort of 311 patients from 3 centers who were treated with surgery 24 h after ictus was recruited. The surgical procedure involved removing the intracerebral hematoma using an aspirator through either the cortical approach or Sylvian fissure approach, assisted by an endoscope or microscope. The primary outcome was the one-year modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. The association between the surgical approach and the one-year mRS score was explored by using ordinal logistic regression and binary logistic regression. Baseline characteristics were balanced by propensity score matching and inverse propensity score weighting. In the adjusted analysis, compared with the cortex approach group, the Sylvian fissure approach group had better one-year mRS scores when analyzed as an ordinal variable (3.00 [2.00-4.00] vs. 4.00 [3.00-5.00]; adjusted odds ratio, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.78-5.58; p < 0.001) and a dichotomous variable (74.14% vs. 49.01%; adjusted odds ratio, 6.61; 95% CI, 2.75-15.88; p < 0.001). Surgical approach was not significantly associated with rebleeding (p = 0.88) or three-month mortality (p = 0.81). In univariate analysis after propensity score matching, there were significant differences in one-year mRS score between the two groups (p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences in rebleeding (Fisher's exact test, p > 0.999) or three-month mortality (Fisher's exact test, p > 0.999). Inverse probability weighted regression analysis showed better one-year mRS scores when analyzed as an ordinal variable (adjusted odds ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.17-4.17; p < 0.001) and a dichotomous variable (adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.16-4.77; p < 0.001) in the Sylvian fissure approach group; the surgical approach was not significantly associated with rebleeding (p = 0.50) or three-month mortality (p = 0.60). In the surgical treatment of patients with spontaneous supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage, the Sylvian fissure approach may lead to a better functional outcome compared with the cortex approach. Future prospective studies are warranted to confirm this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.