ReviewPlant methods2024
Towards portable MRI in the plant sciences.
Review in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel imaging approaches for visualizing root-mycorrhizal fungal interactions.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- In-bore climate control chamber for magnetic resonance imaging of living plants.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Atlas-based spatiotemporal MRI phenotyping of 3D fungal spread in grapevine wood.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Bridging scales: integrated multi-omics and deep phenotyping for climate resilience in crop plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Reverse Sap Flow from Fruit.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- X-ray micro-CT imaging to study foliar water uptake mechanisms in plants with contrasting leaf topography.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) battling against heat stress: plant breeding and genomics advances.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- MRI-Seed-Wizard: combining deep learning algorithms with magnetic resonance imaging enables advanced seed phenotyping.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant physiology and structure are constantly changing according to internal and external factors. The study of plant water dynamics can give information on these changes, as they are linked to numerous plant functions. Currently, most of the methods used to study plant water dynamics are either invasive, destructive, or not easily accessible. Portable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a field undergoing rapid expansion and which presents substantial advantages in the plant sciences. MRI permits the non-invasive study of plant water content, flow, structure, stress response, and other physiological processes, as a multitude of information can be obtained using the method, and portable devices make it possible to take these measurements in situ, in a plant's natural environment. In this work, we review the use of such devices applied to plants in climate chambers, greenhouses or in their natural environments. We also compare the use of portable MRI to other methods to obtain the same information and outline its advantages and disadvantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.