Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368867›Full record

ArticleOphthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde2024

Clinical Landscape of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Germany: Retina.net CSC Registry Report Number 1.

Clemens A Lange, Charlotte Ohlmeier, Anna Kiskämper, Christoph von Schwarzkopf, Hinrich Hufnagel, Markus Gruber, Benedikt Schworm, Ulrike Brocks, Franziska Reinking, Lisa Schreiner and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Clemens A LangeDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Charlotte OhlmeierMacula Monitor Münster (M3), St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Anna KiskämperDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Christoph von SchwarzkopfDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Hinrich HufnagelEye Center, Freiburg Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Markus GruberEye Center, Freiburg Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Benedikt SchwormDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ulrike BrocksDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska ReinkingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lisa SchreinerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Yoko MiuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Milena GrundelDepartment of Ophthalmology Greifswald, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Tibor LohmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christoph R ClemensDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Münster Medical Center, Münster, Germany.
Maria-Andreea GamulescuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Nicole EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Salvatore GrisantiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Siegfried PriglingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin S SpitzerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter WalterDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Hansjürgen A AgostiniEye Center, Freiburg Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas StahlDepartment of Ophthalmology Greifswald, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Laurenz J B PauleikhoffEye Center, Freiburg Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Retina.net CSC-Registry-Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe German Registry of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) collects data on CSC patients in a nationwide multicenter approach to analyze epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentations, as well as diagnosis and treatment patterns.

methodsIn this multicenter cohort study, patients with CSC were enrolled in nine tertiary referral centers in Germany between January 2022 and June 2023. After consenting to the study, demographic data, risk factors, reported symptoms, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), funduscopic findings, disease severity, and diagnostic and treatment decisions were recorded and analyzed.

resultsA total of 539 eyes of 411 CSC patients were enrolled in this study including 308 males (75%) and 103 females (25%). Patients were predominantly of Caucasian origin and had a mean age of 55.5 years (IQR 41.0-70.0). 28% of eyes were classified as acute (<4 months duration) CSC, 28% as chronic (>4 months duration) CSC, 21% as inactive CSC, 11% as chronic atrophic CSC, and 12% as CSC with secondary CNV. 128 patients (31%) demonstrated bilateral CSC. The most common risk factors reported were psychological stress (52%), smoking (38%), arterial hypertension (38%), and a history of or current use of steroids (30%). Most frequently encountered symptoms included decreased visual acuity (76%), metamorphopsia (49%), relative scotoma (47%), blurred vision (19%), and dyschromatopsia (9%). The mean logMAR BCVA on initial examination was 0.2 (≈20/30, IQR 0.2-0.4) but showed significant variation with a tendency of lower BCVA in chronic cases. At the baseline visit, 74% of the overall cohort received no treatment, while 19% underwent local treatment and only 2% underwent systemic treatment. Of the local therapies, anti-VEGF injections were the most frequently performed procedure (33%, mainly for secondary CNV), followed by micropulse laser (28%), focal nonpulsed laser (23%), verteporfin photodynamic therapy (14%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops (2%). Among intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, aflibercept was used most frequently, followed by bevacizumab and ranibizumab.

conclusionThis registry represents one of the largest cohorts of European patients with CSC to date. Patient age and the proportion of women were higher than expected and bilateral active disease was lower than anticipated, highlighting that neither age nor gender should be overemphasized when diagnosing CSC. Therapeutic interventions are heterogeneous and include verteporfin photodynamic therapy, micropulse laser, and anti-VEGF injections in case of secondary CNV.

Indexed as

Central Serous ChorioretinopathyFluorescein AngiographyRegistriesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetinaCentral serous chorioretinopathyDemographicsIncidenceRegistryRetina.netTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38368867
PMCPMC11160426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.