Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368666›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2024

Expanding access to medication treatment for opioid use disorders: Findings from the Washington State hub and spoke effort.

Maureen T Stewart, Shay M Daily, Cindy Parks Thomas, Lee Panas, Grant Ritter, Sharon Reif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maureen T StewartInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, USA. Electronic address: mstewart@brandeis.edu.
Shay M DailyInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Cindy Parks ThomasInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Lee PanasInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Grant RitterInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Sharon ReifInstitute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.

Funding

Research Support CoreP30DA035772 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Haiden A Huskamp, SHARON REIF · 2015 to 2026
$11.3M
Hub and Spoke Model to Improve Pharmacotherapy Use for Opioid Addiction and Promote RecoveryR33DA045851 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI REIF, SHARON · 2018 to 2020
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035772NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA045851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid use disorder (OUD) is a leading cause of preventable death and injury nationwide. Efforts to increase the use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are needed. In 2017, Washington State implemented a Hub and Spoke (HS) model of care with the primary goal of expanding access to MOUD. We examined changes in MOUD utilization among Washington State Medicaid beneficiaries before and after HS implementation.

methodsWe used Medicaid claims data to examine longitudinal changes in MOUD use for beneficiaries with OUD. We conducted a comparative interrupted time series analysis to examine the association between HS policy implementation and rates of MOUD utilization, overall and by type of medication.

resultsBetween 2016 and 2019, a period of increasing OUD prevalence, rates of MOUD utilization among Washington Medicaid beneficiaries increased overall from 39.7 to 50.5. Following HS implementation, rates of MOUD use grew at a significantly greater rate in the HS cohort than in the non-HS cohort (β=0.54, SE=0.02, p< 0.0001, 95% CI 0.49, 0.59). Analyses by medication type show that this rate increase was primarily due to buprenorphine use (β= 0.61, SE= 0.02, p< 0.0001, 95% CI 0.57, 0.65).

conclusionImproved systems of care are needed to make MOUD accessible to all patients in need. The Washington HS model is one strategy that may facilitate and expand MOUD use, particularly buprenorphine. Over the study period, Washington State saw increased use of buprenorphine, which was an emphasis of their HS model.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisUnited StatesWashingtonBuprenorphineHub and spokeMedicaidMedication for opioid use disorderMOUD utilizationOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID38368666
PMCPMC10922849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.