Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368583›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2024

Disease-Modifying Medications in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in the USA: Trends from 2016 to 2021.

Samuel K Peasah, Elizabeth C S Swart, Yan Huang, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Amy L Seybert, Urvashi Patel, Chronis Manolis, Chester B Good

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Programmable chronogenetic gene circuits for self-regulated circadian delivery of biologic drugs.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel K PeasahValue-based Pharmacy Initiatives, Center for High-Value Health Care, UPMC Health Plan, US Steel Tower, 40th Floor. 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA. Peasahsk@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-7392
Elizabeth C S SwartValue-based Pharmacy Initiatives, Center for High-Value Health Care, UPMC Health Plan, US Steel Tower, 40th Floor. 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Yan HuangValue-based Pharmacy Initiatives, Center for High-Value Health Care, UPMC Health Plan, US Steel Tower, 40th Floor. 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Sandra L Kane-GillSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Amy L SeybertSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Urvashi PatelEvernorth Research Institute, Cigna Health, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Chronis ManolisDepartment of Pharmacy, UPMC Health Plan, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chester B GoodValue-based Pharmacy Initiatives, Center for High-Value Health Care, UPMC Health Plan, US Steel Tower, 40th Floor. 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), since their introduction in 1990, have revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Newer DMARDs have recently been approved, influencing treatment patterns and clinical guidelines.

objectiveTo update the current prescribing patterns of DMARDs in the pharmacotherapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to include the pandemic era.

methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional multi-year study. Using Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, we summarized trends in the prevalence of DMARD use in the USA from 2016 to 2021 by year for adult patients ≥ 18 years old with at least one medical RA claim and one pharmacy/medical claim of a DMARD medication. Trends included type of DMARD, class of DMARD (conventional (csDMARDs), biologics [tumor necrosis factor (TNFi) and Non-TNFi), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKs)], and triple therapy [methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), sulfasalazine (SUL)] used.

resultsThe total sample from 2016 to 2021 was 670,679 commercially insured patients. The average age was 63.7 years (SD 13.6), and 76.7% were female and 70% were White. csDMARDs remain the most prescribed (ranging from 77.2 to 79.2%). Although JAKs were the least prescribed DMARD class, their proportion more than doubled from 2016 (1.5%) to 2021 (4%). MTX utilization declined from 40% in 2016 to 34% in 2021. In contrast, HCQ use increased during the pandemic era from < 25% in 2018 to 30% in 2021. Although there is evidence of the therapeutic benefit of triple therapy, its use was very low (~ 1%) compared to biologics only (~ 17%) or biologics+MTX (~ 10%).

conclusionAbout half of patients with RA were on DMARDs. As expected, csDMARDs were highly used consistently. The COVID-19 pandemic might have influenced the use of HCQ and infusion DMARDs. Triple therapy use remains low.

Identifiers

PMID38368583
PMCPMC11176124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.