ArticleHeart and vessels2024
Flow pattern analysis of right ventricular outflow tract in repaired tetralogy of Fallot through 4D flow MRI.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) often shows discrepancies between right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) flow and left ventricular outflow tract flow in patients with late-stage repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF), leading to potential errors in pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) assessment. This study aimed to identify the conditions under which RVOT flow can be acutely evaluated using four-dimensional (4D) flow CMR. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with rTOF underwent both two-dimensional phase-contrast (2D PC) and 4D flow CMR between 2016 and 2018, excluding those with peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis, RVOT conduit replacement, unknown surgical method, and an aortic valve regurgitation greater than 20%. Seven healthy controls also underwent only 4D Flow CMR. All healthy controls and fifteen patients with rTOF showed laminar RVOT flow, while seven patients exhibited helical, and four patients exhibited vortical RVOT flow in 4D flow CMR visualization. Flow-volume concordance between the pulmonary artery and aortic flow was significantly lower in patients with rTOF and PRF > 40% in 2D PC CMR. This concordance rate in the suprapulmonary valve was high in both the TOF and control groups, comparing at five RVOT locations in 4D flow CMR. Regarding RVOT flow regurgitation in 4D flow, the whole bulk evaluation exhibited greater variation depending on the flow type compared to the whole pixel-wise evaluation. The study confirmed the flow volume at the upper section of the pulmonary valve as the most accurate correlate of aortic flow volume. Furthermore, the 4D flow CMR using the pixel-wise method demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the traditional bulk flow method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.