Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368575›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2024

scEM: A New Ensemble Framework for Predicting Cell Type Composition Based on scRNA-Seq Data.

Xianxian Cai, Wei Zhang, Xiaoying Zheng, Yaxin Xu, Yuanyuan Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xianxian CaiSchool of Sciences, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Sciences, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, 330013, China. wzhang_math@whu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-7956
Xiaoying ZhengOperations research and planning department, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, China.
Yaxin XuSchool of Sciences, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Yuanyuan LiSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12161039National Natural Science Foundation of China 61802125Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20212ACB211002Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20224BAB201011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology, many scRNA-seq data have become available, providing an unprecedented opportunity to explore cellular composition and heterogeneity. Recently, many computational algorithms for predicting cell type composition have been developed, and these methods are typically evaluated on different datasets and performance metrics using diverse techniques. Consequently, the lack of comprehensive and standardized comparative analysis makes it difficult to gain a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of these methods. To address this gap, we reviewed 20 cutting-edge unsupervised cell type identification methods and evaluated these methods comprehensively using 24 real scRNA-seq datasets of varying scales. In addition, we proposed a new ensemble cell-type identification method, named scEM, which learns the consensus similarity matrix by applying the entropy weight method to the four representative methods are selected. The Louvain algorithm is adopted to obtain the final classification of individual cells based on the consensus matrix. Extensive evaluation and comparison with 11 other similarity-based methods under real scRNA-seq datasets demonstrate that the newly developed ensemble algorithm scEM is effective in predicting cellular type composition.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSingle-Cell AnalysisComputational BiologyHumansRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisClusteringComparative analysisEnsemble methodscRNA-seq data

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.