Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368481›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Deep learning algorithm (YOLOv7) for automated renal mass detection on contrast-enhanced MRI: a 2D and 2.5D evaluation of results.

Pouria Yazdian Anari, Nathan Lay, Aryan Zahergivar, Fatemeh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Aditi Chaurasia, Mahshid Golagha, Shiva Singh, Fatemeh Homayounieh, Fiona Obiezu, Stephanie Harmon and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. State of the art review of AI in renal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Pouria Yazdian AnariRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Nathan LayArtificial Intelligence Resource, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Aryan ZahergivarRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Fatemeh Dehghani FirouzabadiRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Aditi ChaurasiaUrology Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Mahshid GolaghaRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Shiva SinghRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Fatemeh Homayounieh
Fiona ObiezuRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Stephanie HarmonArtificial Intelligence Resource, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Evrim TurkbeyRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Maria MerinoPathology Department, National Cancer Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Elizabeth C JonesRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Mark W BallUrology Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
W Marston LinehanUrology Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Baris TurkbeyArtificial Intelligence Resource, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Ashkan A MalayeriRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center,, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 1C352, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. ashkan.malayeri@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-7343

Funding

Molecular Therapeutics of Kidney Cancer: VHL Gene and Fumarate Hydratase GeneZIABC011038 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LINEHAN, WILLIAM MARSTON · 2009 to 2025
$29.8M
Molecular Therapeutics of Kidney Cancer: MET Gene and BHD GeneZIABC011043 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LINEHAN, WILLIAM MARSTON · 2009 to 2025
$20.9M
Clinical Studies of the Molecular Genetic Basis of Kidney CancerZIABC011028 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LINEHAN, WILLIAM MARSTON · 2009 to 2025
$17.9M
Clinical Nursing and Data Management CoreZIDBC011089 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LINEHAN, WILLIAM MARSTON · 2009 to 2025
$17.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccurate diagnosis and treatment of kidney tumors greatly benefit from automated solutions for detection and classification on MRI. In this study, we explore the application of a deep learning algorithm, YOLOv7, for detecting kidney tumors on contrast-enhanced MRI. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe assessed the performance of YOLOv7 tumor detection on excretory phase MRIs in a large institutional cohort of patients with RCC. Tumors were segmented on MRI using ITK-SNAP and converted to bounding boxes. The cohort was randomly divided into ten benchmarks for training and testing the YOLOv7 algorithm. The model was evaluated using both 2-dimensional and a novel in-house developed 2.5-dimensional approach. Performance measures included F1, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Sensitivity, F1 curve, PPV-Sensitivity curve, Intersection over Union (IoU), and mean average PPV (mAP).

resultsA total of 326 patients with 1034 tumors with 7 different pathologies were analyzed across ten benchmarks. The average 2D evaluation results were as follows: Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 0.69 ± 0.05, sensitivity of 0.39 ± 0.02, and F1 score of 0.43 ± 0.03. For the 2.5D evaluation, the average results included a PPV of 0.72 ± 0.06, sensitivity of 0.61 ± 0.06, and F1 score of 0.66 ± 0.04. The best model performance demonstrated a 2.5D PPV of 0.75, sensitivity of 0.69, and F1 score of 0.72.

conclusionUsing computer vision for tumor identification is a cutting-edge and rapidly expanding subject. In this work, we showed that YOLOv7 can be utilized in the detection of kidney cancers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellDeep LearningKidney NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRandom AllocationComputer visionDeep learningRenal cell carcinomaYOLOv7

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.