Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368466›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Coverage for evidence-based cancer survivorship care services.

Anne H Blaes, Maysa M Abu-Khalaf, Catherine M Bender, Susan F Dent, Chunkit Fung, Sophia K Smith, Samantha Watson, Sweatha Katta, Janette K Merrill, Shawna V Hudson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Anne H BlaesUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Blaes004@umn.edu.
Maysa M Abu-KhalafThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Catherine M BenderUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Susan F DentDuke University Durham, Durham, NC, USA.
Chunkit FungUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sophia K SmithDuke University Durham, Durham, NC, USA.
Samantha WatsonSamfund, Boston, MA, USA.
Sweatha KattaAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Janette K MerrillAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Shawna V HudsonRutgers University, Rutgers, NJ, USA.
American Society of Clinical Oncology · USDuke University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSAMFund · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Survivorship Committee established a task force to determine which survivorship care services were being denied by public and private payers for coverage and reimbursement.

methodsA quantitative survey instrument was developed to determine the clinical practice-reported rates of coverage denials for evidence-based cancer survivorship care services. Additionally, qualitative interviews were conducted to understand whether coverage denials were based on payer policies, cost-sharing, or prior authorization.

resultsOf 122 respondents from 50 states, respondents reported that coverage denials were common ("always," "most of the time," or "some of the time") for maintenance therapies, screening for new primary cancers or cancer recurrence. Respondents reported that denials in coverage for maintenance therapies were highest for immunotherapy (41.74%) and maintenance chemotherapy (40.17%). Coverage denials for new primary cancer screenings were highest for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors needing a PET/CT scan (49.04%) and breast cancer survivors at a high risk of recurrence who needed an MRI (63.46%), respectively. More than half of survey respondents reported denials for symptom management and supportive care services. Fertility services, dental services when indicated, and mental health services were denied "always" or "most of the time" 23.1%, 22.5%, and 12.8%, respectively. Respondents reported they often had a process in place to automatically appeal denials for evidence-based services. The denial process, however, resulted in greater stress for the patient and provider.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that additional advocacy with payers is needed to ensure that reimbursement policies are consistent with evidence-based survivorship care services.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsSurvivorshipBreastHumansInsurance CoverageNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyCancerSurvivorsSurvivorship care services

Identifiers

PMID38368466
PMCPMC10874319
OpenAlexW4391895768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.