ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2024
Effective density of inhaled environmental and engineered nanoparticles and its impact on the lung deposition and dosimetry.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A quantitative framework for animal-to-human extrapolation of inhaled aerosols using species-specific respiratory dosimetry.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Based Approaches for Enhancing In Vitro Fertilization in Animal Reproduction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Impact of nanoplastics emitted from incineration of polyethylene plastic on THP-1 macrophage viability and immune function.Journal of hazardous materials · 2026Article
- Impact of Canadian Wildfire-Emitted Particulate Matter on THP-1 Lung Macrophage Health and Function.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- SiOScientific reports · 2025Article
- Nanotoxicology: developments and new insights.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAirborne environmental and engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are inhaled and deposited in the respiratory system. The inhaled dose of such NPs and their deposition location in the lung determines their impact on health. When calculating NP deposition using particle inhalation models, a common approach is to use the bulk material density, ρ
resultsHere, the deposition of various environmental NPs (aircraft and diesel black carbon, wood smoke) and engineered NPs (silica, zirconia) in the respiratory system of humans and mice is calculated using the Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry model accounting for their realistic structure and effective density. This is done by measuring the NP ρ
conclusionsThe doses of inhaled NPs are overestimated by inhalation particle deposition models when the ρ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.