Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368360›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2024

Functional outcomes of different surgical treatments for common peroneal nerve injuries: a retrospective comparative study.

Zhen Pang, Shuai Zhu, Yun-Dong Shen, Yan-Qun Qiu, Yu-Qi Liu, Wen-Dong Xu, Hua-Wei Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhen Pang *Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuai Zhu *Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yun-Dong ShenDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan-Qun QiuDepartment of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Jing'an District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Qi LiuInstitute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Wen-Dong XuDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hua-Wei YinDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. yinhuawei1983@126.com.
Huashan Hospital · CNJingzhou Central Hospital · CNCenter for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos. 81801941, 82021002, 81830063the Fujian Province Science and Technology Innovation Joint Fund Programme No. 2021Y9129the National Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Program No. 2021ZD0204200the Program of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning No. 20164Y0018the Shanghai Municipal Clinical Medical Center Project No. 2022ZZ01007the Shanghai Technology Innovation Plan No. 21Y11902900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to assess the recovery patterns and factors influencing outcomes in patients with common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury.

methodsThis retrospective study included 45 patients with CPN injuries treated between 2009 and 2019 in Jing'an District Central Hospital. The surgical interventions were categorized into three groups: neurolysis (group A; n = 34 patients), nerve repair (group B; n = 5 patients) and tendon transfer (group C; n = 6 patients). Preoperative and postoperative sensorimotor functions were evaluated using the British Medical Research Council grading system. The outcome of measures included the numeric rating scale, walking ability, numbness and satisfaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal time interval between injury and surgery for predicting postoperative foot dorsiflexion function, toe dorsiflexion function, and sensory function.

resultsSurgical interventions led to improvements in foot dorsiflexion strength in all patient groups, enabling most to regain independent walking ability. Group A (underwent neurolysis) had significant sensory function restoration (P < 0.001), and three patients in Group B (underwent nerve repair) had sensory improvements. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal time interval for achieving M3 foot dorsiflexion recovery was 9.5 months, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.871 (95% CI = 0.661-1.000, P = 0.040). For M4 foot dorsiflexion recovery, the optimal cut-off was 5.5 months, with an AUC of 0.785 (95% CI = 0.575-0.995, P = 0.020). When using M3 toe dorsiflexion recovery or S4 sensory function recovery as the gold standard, the optimal cut-off remained at 5.5 months, with AUCs of 0.768 (95% CI = 0.582-0.953, P = 0.025) and 0.853 (95% CI = 0.693-1.000, P = 0.001), respectively.

conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of early surgical intervention in CPN injury recovery, with optimal outcomes achieved when surgery is performed within 5.5 to 9.5 months post-injury. These findings provide guidance for clinicians in tailoring treatment plans to the specific characteristics and requirements of CPN injury patients.

Indexed as

Peroneal NervePeroneal NeuropathiesHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesCommon peroneal nerve injury (CPN injury)Nerve repairNeurolysisTendon transfer

Identifiers

PMID38368360
PMCPMC10874551
OpenAlexW4391896475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.