Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38368326›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2024

Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Takatoshi Koroki, Yuki Kotani, Takahiko Yaguchi, Taisuke Shibata, Motoki Fujii, Stefano Fresilli, Mayuko Tonai, Toshiyuki Karumai, Todd C Lee, Giovanni Landoni and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
28.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Pharmacology of Physiologically Difficult Airway Management and Impact on Hemodynamics: A Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Takatoshi KorokiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Yuki KotaniDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan. kotani.yuki@kameda.jp.
Takahiko YaguchiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Taisuke ShibataDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Motoki FujiiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Stefano FresilliDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Mayuko TonaiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Toshiyuki KarumaiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Todd C LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Giovanni LandoniDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Yoshiro HayashiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, 296-8602, Japan.
Kameda Medical Center · JPIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracheal intubation is a high-risk intervention commonly performed in critically ill patients. Due to its favorable cardiovascular profile, ketamine is considered less likely to compromise clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether ketamine, compared with other agents, reduces mortality in critically ill patients undergoing intubation.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 27, 2023, for randomized controlled trials and matched observational studies comparing ketamine with any control in critically ill patients as an induction agent. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available, and the secondary outcomes included Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, ventilator-free days at day 28, vasopressor-free days at day 28, post-induction mean arterial pressure, and successful intubation on the first attempt. For the primary outcome, we used a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis on the risk ratio (RR) scale with a weakly informative neutral prior corresponding to a mean estimate of no difference with 95% probability; the estimated effect size will fall between a relative risk of 0.25 and 4. The RR and 95% credible interval (CrI) were used to estimate the probability of mortality reduction (RR < 1). The secondary outcomes were assessed with a frequentist random-effects model. We registered this study in Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/2vf79/ ).

resultsWe included seven randomized trials and one propensity-matched study totaling 2978 patients. Etomidate was the comparator in all the identified studies. The probability that ketamine reduced mortality was 83.2% (376/1475 [25%] vs. 411/1503 [27%]; RR, 0.93; 95% CrI, 0.79-1.08), which was confirmed by a subgroup analysis excluding studies with a high risk of bias. No significant difference was observed in any secondary outcomes.

conclusionsAll of the included studies evaluated ketamine versus etomidate among critically ill adults requiring tracheal intubation. This meta-analysis showed a moderate probability that induction with ketamine is associated with a reduced risk of mortality.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCritical IllnessEtomidateIntubation, IntratrachealKetamineHumansEtomidateKetamineBayes theoremIntensive care unitsIntubationKetamineMeta-analysisMortalitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38368326
PMCPMC10874027
OpenAlexW4391899448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.