ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2025
Implementation and validation of 2-D-array based tests in routine linac quality assurance.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn medical linac quality assurance (QA), to replace film dosimetry with low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array measurements, to validate the procedures, and to perform a comprehensive sensitivity analysis.
methodsA 2-D ionization chamber array with a spatial resolution of 7.62 mm was deployed to perform the following tests: Junction tests, MLC transmission test, beam profile constancy vs. gantry angle test, beam profile constancy vs. low dose delivery test, and beam energy constancy vs. low dose delivery test. Test validation and sensitivity analyses based on short- and long-term statistics of the test results were performed.
resultsAll selected mechanical and dosimetry tests could be successfully performed with a 2-D array. Considering the tolerance limits recommended by the AAPM Task Group 142 report (2009), sensitivities of 99.0% or better and specificities ranging from 99.5% to 99.9% could be achieved in all tests when the proper metrics were chosen.
conclusionsThe results showed that a low-resolution 2-D ionization chamber array could replace film dosimetry without having to sacrifice high test sensitivity. Its implementation in the routine clinical linac QA program may involve considerable QA time savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.