Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38367968›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Cost-effectiveness of the ONCORAL multidisciplinary programme for the management of outpatients taking oral anticancer agents at risk of drug-related event: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled study.

Laure Huot, Pascale Guerre, Guillaume Descotes, Anne-Gaëlle Caffin, Chloé Herledan, Florence Ranchon, Catherine Rioufol

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03660670 (Medico-economic Evaluation of the ONCORAL Program of Multidisciplinary ONCOlogic Interventions Between Town and Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03660670 naunknown statusnot on this map

Medico-economic Evaluation of the ONCORAL Program of Multidisciplinary ONCOlogic Interventions Between Town and Hospital (Doctor-pharmacist-nurse) for Ambulatory Patients Under oRAL Anticancer Drugs Versus Usual Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2020 to 2025Enrolled215ConditionsCancerArmsONCORAL therapeutic education, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of the ONCORAL multidisciplinary city-hospital follow-up on older patients with cancer treated with oral anticancer drugs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laure HuotHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service Evaluation Economique en Santé, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7870-9912
Pascale GuerreHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service Evaluation Economique en Santé, Lyon, France.
Guillaume DescotesHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Anne-Gaëlle CaffinHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Chloé HerledanHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Florence Ranchon *Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Catherine Rioufol *Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Unité de Pharmacie Clinique Oncologique, Pierre-Bénite, France catherine.rioufol@chu-lyon.fr.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe development of oral anticancer agents (OAA) has profoundly changed cancer care, leading patients to manage their chemotherapy treatment on an outpatient basis. The prevention of iatrogenic effects of OAA remains a major concern, especially since their side effects are not less serious than those of intravenous chemotherapy. The ONCORAL programme was set up to secure the management of OAA in cancer patients followed at the Lyon University Hospital. This multidisciplinary programme involves hospital pharmacists, nurses, oncologists, and haematologists, as well as community health professionals. Given the economic stakes that this programme entails for the health system, a medico-economic study was designed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective controlled study, with individual open-label randomisation. A total of 216 outpatients treated with OAA and at risk of developing a drug-related iatrogenic event, will be randomised (2:1) to undergo follow-up in the ONCORAL programme or usual care. The primary outcome will be the estimation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (difference in total costs per quality adjusted life years gained) at 12 months between the two groups. The secondary outcomes will be evaluation of OAA management consequences (relative-dose intensity, adherence, adverse drug events, drug-drug interactions, and proven medication errors), evaluation of overall survival and cancer-related quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes in relation to the treatment. A budget impact analysis will be implemented. Patient and health professional satisfaction regarding the ONCORAL programme will be measured. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval to conduct this study was obtained from an Ethics Committee (

trial registrationNCT03660670.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsOutpatientsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansIatrogenic DiseasePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsAdult oncologyHealth economicsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID38367968
PMCPMC10875583
OpenAlexW4391899709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.