Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38367507›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2024

Indirect effects of emotion regulation in the relationship between pain and cannabis use in adults 18-64 years.

Ty S Schepis, Andrew H Rogers, Liliana Munoz, Michael J Zvolensky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ty S SchepisDepartment of Psychology, Texas State University, USA; Translational Health Research Center, Texas State University, USA; Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking, and Health, University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: schepis@txstate.edu.
Andrew H RogersDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Liliana MunozDepartment of Psychology, Texas State University, USA.
Michael J ZvolenskyDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA; HEALTH Institute, University of Houston, USA.
Seattle Children's Hospital · USTexas Department of State Health Services · USTexas State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Testing a Digital Therapeutic for Smoking Cessation among Hispanic Persons who SmokeU54MD015946 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI Bettina M. Beech · 2020 to 2026
$22.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD015946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndividuals with chronic pain often receive prescription opioid medication, and they may use cannabis to treat pain as well, although the risks of cannabis-opioid co-use are significant. This study aimed to investigate whether two transdiagnostic factors, emotion regulation and distress tolerance, had significant indirect effects in the relationship between pain and cannabis use in adults with chronic pain and an opioid prescription.

methodsParticipants (n = 450; mean age = 38.6 ± 11.09) were recruited using Qualtrics panel service and were 75 % female and 79 % White, non-Hispanic. Participants completed a 30-minute self-report survey capturing three-month cannabis use, the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale (DERS), and the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS). The Graded Pain Scale (GCPS) assessed pain severity/intensity and disability. Analyses used the SPSS PROCESS macro, with both single (i.e., one transdiagnostic factor) and parallel indirect effects (i.e., both the DERS and DTS) examined.

resultsThere were statistically significant indirect effects for both the DERS and DTS in the relationship between pain intensity or disability and three-month cannabis use in single factor models. In the parallel indirect effect model, only the DERS was statistically significant (intensity indirect effect coefficient = 0.0195 % confidence interval [95 %CI] = 0.0065, 0.390; disability indirect effect coefficient = 0.0147, 95 %CI = 0.0055, 0.0274).

conclusionsWhen examining parallel indirect effects, only emotional regulation and not distress tolerance mediated the relationship between chronic pain and cannabis use among those with an opioid prescription. Clinically, interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation in individuals with chronic pain can help limit cannabis and opioid co-use.

Indexed as

CannabisChronic PainEmotional RegulationHallucinogensOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidHallucinogensAnalgesicsCannabisChronic painDistress toleranceEmotional regulationOpioid

Identifiers

PMID38367507
PMCPMC11360606
OpenAlexW4391719544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.