Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38367345›Full record

ArticleReproduction & fertility2024

Assessment of the impact of direct in vitro PFAS treatment on mouse spermatozoa.

Leah Calvert, Jacinta H Martin, Amanda L Anderson, Ilana R Bernstein, Nathan D Burke, Geoffry N De Iuliis, Andrew L Eamens, Matthew D Dun, Brett D Turner, Shaun D Roman and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Leah CalvertSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Jacinta H MartinSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0876-5150
Amanda L AndersonSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Ilana R BernsteinSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Nathan D BurkeSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Geoffry N De IuliisSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Andrew L EamensSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia.
Matthew D DunInfertility and Reproduction Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Brett D TurnerCentre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Shaun D RomanNSW Health Pathology, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Mark P GreenSchool of BioSciences, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brett NixonSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2745-8188
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Targeted Call for Research into Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkylated Substances APP1189415NHMRC Investigator Grant APP1173892NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship APP1154837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Poly- and per-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic environmentally persistent chemicals. Despite the phaseout of specific PFAS, their inherent stability has resulted in ubiquitous and enduring environmental contamination. PFAS bioaccumulation has been reported globally with omnipresence in most populations wherein they have been associated with a range of negative health effects, including strong associations with increased instances of testicular cancer and reductions in overall semen quality. To elucidate the biological basis of such effects, we employed an acute in vitro exposure model in which the spermatozoa of adult male mice were exposed to a cocktail of PFAS chemicals at environmentally relevant concentrations. We hypothesized that direct PFAS treatment of spermatozoa would induce reactive oxygen species generation and compromise the functional profile and DNA integrity of exposed cells. Despite this, post-exposure functional testing revealed that short-term PFAS exposure (3 h) did not elicit a cytotoxic effect, nor did it overtly influence the functional profile, capacitation rate, or the in vitro fertilization ability of spermatozoa. PFAS treatment of spermatozoa did, however, result in a significant delay in the developmental progression of the day 4 pre-implantation embryos produced in vitro. This developmental delay could not be attributed to a loss of sperm DNA integrity, DNA damage, or elevated levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species. When considered together, the results presented here raise the intriguing prospect that spermatozoa exposed to a short-term PFAS exposure period potentially harbor an alternate stress signal that is delivered to the embryo upon fertilization. Lay summary: PFAS are synthetic chemicals widely used in non-stick cookware, food packaging, and firefighting foam. Such extensive use has led to concerning levels of environmental contamination and reports of associations with a spectrum of negative health outcomes, including testicular cancer and reduced semen quality. To investigate the effects of PFAS on male reproduction, we incubated mouse sperm in a cocktail of nine PFAS at environmentally relevant concentrations before checking for a range of functional outcomes. This treatment strategy was not toxic to the sperm; it did not kill them or reduce their motility, nor did it affect their fertilization capacity. However, we did observe developmental delays among pre-implantation embryos created using PFAS-treated sperm. Such findings raise the intriguing prospect that PFAS-exposed sperm harbor a form of stress signal that they deliver to the embryo upon fertilization.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalRodent DiseasesTesticular NeoplasmsAnimalsDNAMaleMiceReactive Oxygen SpeciesSemenSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaDNAFluorocarbonsReactive Oxygen Speciesembryo developmentenvironmental contaminantsmale fertilitymale infertilitymale reproductionperfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)spermatozoatoxicants

Identifiers

PMID38367345
PMCPMC10959046
OpenAlexW4391888702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.