Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38367172›Full record

ArticleCurrent diabetes reports2024

Mapping Lifestyle Interventions for Gestational Diabetes Prevention: A Scoping Review.

Armando Peña, Alison M Miller, Angela G Campbell, Richard J Holden, Christina M Scifres

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current diabetes reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Armando PeñaDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health in Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. arpena@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8219-9433
Alison M MillerDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health in Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2351-7558
Angela G CampbellApplied Health Sciences, School of Public Health in Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-7595
Richard J HoldenDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health in Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Christina M ScifresDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review to map intervention, sample, and physiologic measurement characteristics of lifestyle interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevention. RECENT

findingsA total of 19 studies met selection criteria from 405 articles screened (PubMed, Web of Science). No studies were US-based (47% multi-site), and all were delivered in clinical settings. The most targeted nutrition components were low carbohydrate intake (sugar rich foods/added sugars, low glycemic index), low fat intake (mainly low-fat meat, dairy, and saturated fat), and increased fruits and vegetables. Many studies promoted 150 min/week moderate-intensity physical activity. Only two studies provided supervised physical activity sessions. Dietitians and nurses were the most common implementers. Samples were characterized as adults with obesity (mean age 31 yr, BMI 31 kg/m

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalAdultExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleObesityPregnancyRisk FactorsDietaryExerciseHealth behaviorHyperglycemiaImplementation

Identifiers

PMID38367172
OpenAlexW4391897838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.