ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
Bacteriological and molecular study of fosfomycin resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic Fosfomycin Susceptibility and Detection of Plasmid-Mediated Resistance Genes in Clinical UropathogenicMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance, Biofilm Formation, and Phylogenetic Distribution ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of genes associated with resistance has the potential to facilitate the development of novel diagnostic tests and treatment methods. The objective of this study was to examine the antibiotic resistance and Fosfomycin resistance genes in uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) in patients in Baghdad, Iraq. After analyzing 250 urine samples using various identification methods, including the examination of morphological characteristics, biochemical tests, and genetic detection, it was determined that E. coli was the most common bacteria present, accounting for 63.6% of the samples. Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed a significant prevalence of resistance to various antibiotics, with 99.3% of E. coli isolates exhibiting multiple drug resistance (MDR). Fosfomycin showed antibacterial properties against UPEC. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged from 512 to 1024 μg/mL, while the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was 2048 μg/mL. In the time-kill assay, fosfomycin was effective against fosfomycin-resistant isolates within 8-12 h. The genetic determinants associated with fosfomycin resistance were examined through the utilization of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The findings indicated that the genes murA, glpT, and cyaA were detected in all the isolates when genomic DNA was used as a template. However, all the tests yielded negative results when plasmid was used as a template. The genes fosA3 and fosA4 were detected in 8.6% and 5% of the isolates when genomic DNA was used as a template. When plasmid was used as a template, the genes fosA3 and fosA4 were found in 5.7% and 2.9% of the isolates, respectively. In conclusion, there is an increasing problem with antibiotic resistance in UPEC, with elevated rates of resistance to several antibiotics. The study also offers novel insights into the genetic foundation of fosfomycin resistance in UPEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.