Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38367130›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2024

Spatial distribution pattern and health risk of groundwater contamination by cadmium, manganese, lead and nitrate in groundwater of an arid area.

Mohamad Sakizadeh, Chaosheng Zhang, Adam Milewski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamad SakizadehDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Lavizan, 1678815811, Tehran, Iran. msakizadeh@gmail.com.
Chaosheng ZhangInternational Network for Environment and Health (INEH), School of Geography, Archaeology and Irish Studies, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Adam MilewskiDepartment of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining the results of base models to create a meta-model is one of the ensemble approaches known as stacking. In this study, stacking of five base learners, including eXtreme gradient boosting, random forest, feed-forward neural networks, generalized linear models with Lasso or Elastic Net regularization, and support vector machines, was used to study the spatial variation of Mn, Cd, Pb, and nitrate in Qom-Kahak Aquifers, Iran. The stacking strategy proved to be an effective substitute predictor for existing machine learning approaches due to its high accuracy and stability when compared to individual learners. Contrarily, there was not any best-performing base model for all of the involved parameters. For instance, in the case of cadmium, random forest produced the best results, with adjusted R

Indexed as

GroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdultCadmiumChildEnvironmental MonitoringHumansManganeseNitratesPhosphatesCadmiumManganeseNitratesPhosphatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnsemble machine learningGroundwaterProbabilistic health risk assessmentRedundancy analysisStacking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.