Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Adolescents and young adults with cancer conversations following participation in an advance care planning video pilot.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06786104 (A Multisite RWCT Comparing the Effectiveness of a Goals of Care Video and Navigator Intervention, the VIDEO-PEDS Experience, Versus Usual Care in Pediatric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multisite RWCT Comparing the Effectiveness of a Goals of Care Video and Navigator Intervention, the VIDEO-PEDS Experience, Versus Usual Care in Pediatric Cancer
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Current status of and factors influencing advance care planning participation among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2026Pooled it
- Instability in End-of-Life Goals and Preferences of Patients Who Are Seriously Ill: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Experiences with an Advance Care Planning Intervention for Children with Life-Limiting Conditions: A Qualitative Study of Families and Clinicians Using the IMplementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "You Can Rest Knowing That We Know What You Want"-Longitudinal Advance Care Planning Discussions With Young Adults Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdvance care planning (ACP) discussions can help adolescents and young adults (AYAs) communicate their preferences to their caregivers and clinical team, yet little is known about willingness to hold conversations, content, and evolution of care preferences. We aimed to assess change in care preferences and reasons for such changes over time and examine the reasons for engaging or not engaging in ACP discussions and content of these discussions among AYAs and their caregivers.
methodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of a novel video-based ACP tool among AYA patients aged 18-39 with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Participants were asked their care preferences at baseline, after viewing the video or hearing verbal description (post questionnaire), and again 3 months later. Three-month phone calls also queried if any ACP conversations occurred since the initial study visit. Study team notes from these phone calls were evaluated using content analysis.
resultsForty-five AYAs and 40 caregivers completed the 3-month follow-up. Nearly half of AYAs and caregivers changed their care preference from post questionnaire to 3-month follow-up. Increased reflection and learning on the topic (n = 45) prompted preference change, with participants often noting the nuanced and context-specific nature of these decisions (n = 20). Most AYAs (60%) and caregivers (65%) engaged in ACP conversation(s), often with a family member. Disease-related factors (n = 8), study participation (n = 8), and a desire for shared understanding (n = 6) were common reasons for initiating discussions. Barriers included disease status (n = 14) and timing (n = 12). ACP discussions focused on both specific wishes for treatment (n = 26) and general conversations about goals and values (n = 18).
conclusionAYAs and caregivers acknowledged the complexity of ACP decisions, identifying obstacles and aids for these discussions. Clinicians should support a personalized approach to ACP that captures these nuances, promoting ACP as an iterative, longitudinal, and collaborative process.
trial registrationThis trial was registered 10/31/2019 with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT0414907).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.