Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38367074›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

What is the rate of occult nodal metastasis in squamous cell carcinomas of the sinonasal tract? A systematic review.

Alexandros Poutoglidis, Christos Georgalas, Georgios Fyrmpas, Paraskevi Karamitsou

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandros PoutoglidisDepartment of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christos GeorgalasMedical School, University of Nicosia, 2408, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Georgios FyrmpasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 69100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Paraskevi KaramitsouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 'G. Papanikolaou' General Hospital, Leoforos Papanikolaou, 57010, Thessaloniki, Greece. vivikara28@yahoo.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-3354
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRDemocritus University of Thrace · GRG. Papanikolaou General Hospital · GRUniversity of Nicosia · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe role of elective neck dissection (END) in the management of clinical N0 (cN0) squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the sinonasal tract is unclear. In this systematic review, we evaluate the risk of occult nodal metastasis in sinonasal SCCs with cN0M0 tumors to support clinical decision making.

methodsA literature search was conducted in the following three electronic databases: Medline/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Articles were assessed for eligibility in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two independent authors extracted the data. The Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool was used for the assessment of biases of each included study.

resultsOur systematic review included six studies that met the inclusion criteria, all retrospective in design. The rate of histologically proven metastasis of sinonasal SCC to the clinically negative neck is 12.5%. Almost half of the positive cases are pathologically staged as N2 (6.5%).

conclusionOur systematic review provides the rate of sinonasal SCC occult metastasis to the neck so that the surgeons can discuss with patients the risks and possible merits of adding an elective neck management in the surgical plan.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellLymphatic MetastasisParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesNeck DissectionNeoplasm StagingClinical N0 neckElective neck dissectionHead and neck cancerOccult nodal metastasisSinonasal squamous cell carcinomaSinonasal tract

Identifiers

PMID38367074
OpenAlexW4391899414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.