Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366737›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2024

Gap analysis between trainees' subjective competencies and the competencies expected by instructors in urology: A need assessment survey in Japan.

Kanta Hori, Takashige Abe, Noriyuki Abe, Junya Abe, Kazufumi Okada, Keita Takahashi, Shigeru Harada, Jun Furumido, Sachiyo Murai, Masafumi Kon and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current Landscape of Urological Surgical Training: A Needs Assessment Survey in Japan.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Support for the Struggling Learner in Urology.Current urology reports · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kanta HoriDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5875-6738
Takashige AbeDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5468-7632
Noriyuki AbeDepartment of Urology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Junya AbeDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazufumi OkadaPromotion Unit, Data Science Center, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Keita TakahashiPromotion Unit, Data Science Center, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Shigeru HaradaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Jun FurumidoDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4526-6529
Sachiyo MuraiDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Masafumi KonDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Kohei HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0873-4642
Naoya MasumoriDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hidehiro KakizakiDepartment of Urology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Nobuo ShinoharaDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccording to the rapid progress in surgical techniques, a growing number of procedures should be learned during postgraduate training periods. This study aimed to clarify the current situation regarding urological surgical training and identify the perception gap between trainees' competency and the competency expected by instructors in Japan.

methodsRegarding the 40 urological surgical procedures selected via the Delphi method, we collected data on previous caseloads, current subjective autonomy, and confidence for future skill acquisition from trainees (<15 post-graduate years [PGY]), and the competencies when trainees became attending doctors expected by instructors (>15 PGY), according to a 5-point Likert scale. In total, 174 urologists in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan were enrolled in this study.

resultsThe response rate was 96% (165/174). In a large proportion of the procedures, caseloads grew with accumulation of years of clinical practice. However, trainees had limited caseloads of robotic and reconstructive surgeries even after 15 PGY. Trainees showed low subjective competencies at present and low confidence for future skill acquisition in several procedures, such as open cystectomy, ureteroureterostomy, and ureterocystostomy, while instructors expected trainees to be able to perform these procedures independently when they became attending doctors.

conclusionTrainees showed low subjective competencies and low confidence for future skill acquisition in several open and reconstructive procedures, while instructors considered that these procedures should be independently performable by attending doctors. We believe that knowledge of these perception gaps is helpful to develop a practical training program.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrologyAdultDelphi TechniqueEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesUrologistsgap analysisneeds assessment surveysurgical educationsurgical trainingurologic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID38366737
PMCPMC11524097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.