Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366646›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2024

Trial-level ERPs predicted behavioral responses during self-referential processing in late childhood.

Pan Liu, Xiao Yang, Jaron X Y Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pan LiuDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1278-2129
Xiao YangDepartments of Health Sciences and Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jaron X Y TanDepartment of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.

Funding

Center for Visual and Cognitive NeuroscienceP20GM103505 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOURT, MARK E. · 2012 to 2014
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS COBRE P20 GM103505NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-referential information is uniquely salient and preferentially processed even in children. The literature has used the self-referent encoding task (SRET) combined with event-related potentials (ERPs) to study self-referential processing and its associations with youth psychopathology. However, it is unclear how the ERP and behavioral indices of SRET are associated with each other, although this knowledge can promote our mechanistic understanding of this construct and its role in psychopathology. We examined this question in 115 9- to 12-year-old children, a critical period for the development of self-related concepts. By applying a multilevel modeling approach to the trial-level data of SRET, we disaggregated the between- and within-person variability and observed within-person, but not between-person, effects of the P2 and late positive potential (LPP) on behavioral responses: a larger P2 on a given trial predicted a faster response in this trial; a larger LPP on a given trial predicted a higher likelihood of endorsing the word of this trial. We provided novel evidence on how the within-person variability of the ERPs predicted the overt responses of the SRET in children. These findings inform our mechanistic knowledge of self-referential processing and shed light on a better understanding of the role of self-referential processing in the development of psychopathology.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsMental DisordersChildHumansSelf ConceptEEGmultilevel modelpre-adolescenceself-schematic processingtrial-level analysis

Identifiers

PMID38366646
PMCPMC10873861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.