ArticleThe British journal of radiology2024
Differentiation of acute coronary syndrome with radiomics of pericoronary adipose tissue.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Machine Learning Models in Major Cardiovascular Adverse Events Prediction Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- From Electrocardiography to the Catheterization Laboratory: A Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Framework for Acute Coronary Syndrome Detection and Risk Stratification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Radiomics-Based Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review of Predictive Performance, Validation, and Incremental Value.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Preliminary exploration of the value of pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics in identifying high-risk patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a retrospective Chinese cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis of pericoronary adipose tissue for detecting ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in NAFLD patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Computed tomography-based assessment of pericoronary adipose tissue in cardiovascular diseases: Diagnostic and prognostic implications.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review of Machine-Learning Derived Radiomic Analysis of CT and PET Imaging to Investigate Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the potential values of radiomics signatures of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) in identifying patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
methodsIn total, 149, 227, and 244 patients were clinically diagnosed with ACS, chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), and without coronary artery disease (CAD), respectively, and were retrospectively analysed and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a 2:1 ratio. From the PCATs of the proximal left anterior descending branch, left circumflex branch, and right coronary artery (RCA), the pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) value and radiomics signatures were calculated, among which features closely related to ACS were screened out. The ACS differentiation models AC1, AC2, AC3, AN1, AN2, and AN3 were constructed based on the FAI value of RCA and the final screened out first-order and texture features, respectively.
resultsThe FAI values were all higher in patients with ACS than in those with CCS and no CAD (all P < .05). For the identification of ACS and CCS, the area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of AC1, AC2, and AC3 were 0.92, 0.94, and 0.91 and 0.91, 0.86, and 0.88 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. For the identification of ACS and no CAD, the AUC values of AN1, AN2, and AN3 were 0.95, 0.94, and 0.94 and 0.93, 0.87, and 0.89 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively.
conclusionsIdentification models constructed based on the radiomics signatures of PCAT are expected to be an effective tool for identifying patients with ACS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The radiomics signatures of PCAT and FAI values are expected to differentiate between patients with ACS, CCS and those without CAD on imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.