Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366313›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2024

Understanding perceptions of tumor genomic profile testing in Black/African American cancer patients in a qualitative study: the role of medical mistrust, provider communication, and family support.

Caseem C Luck, Sarah Bauerle Bass, Yana Chertock, Patrick J A Kelly, Katie Singley, Ariel Hoadley, Michael J Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Using the Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Understand COVID-19 Booster Hesitancy in Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caseem C LuckRisk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. caseem.luck@temple.edu.
Sarah Bauerle BassRisk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-1609
Yana ChertockDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Patrick J A KellyDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-1150
Katie SingleyRisk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Ariel HoadleyRisk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-0358
Michael J HallDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-3409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) examines genes and somatic mutations specific to a patient's tumor to identify targets for cancer treatments but can also uncover secondary hereditary (germline) mutations. Most patients are unprepared to make complex decisions related to this information. Black/African American (AA) cancer patients are especially at risk because of lower health literacy, higher levels of medical mistrust, and lower awareness and knowledge of genetic testing. But little is known about their TGP attitudes or preferences. Five in-person focus groups were conducted with Black/AA cancer patients (N = 33) from an NCI-designated cancer center and an affiliated oncology unit in an urban safety-net hospital located in Philadelphia. Focus groups explored participants' understanding of TGP, cultural beliefs about genetics, medical mistrust, and how these perceptions informed decision-making. Participants were mostly female (81.8%), and one-third had some college education; mean age was 57 with a SD of 11.35. Of patients, 33.3% reported never having heard of TGP, and 48.5% were not aware of having had TGP as part of their cancer treatment. Qualitative analysis was guided by the principles of applied thematic analysis and yielded five themes: (1) mistrust of medical institutions spurring independent health-information seeking; (2) genetic testing results as both empowering and overwhelming; (3) how provider-patient communication can obviate medical mistrust; (4) how unsupportive patient-family communication undermines interest in secondary-hereditary risk communication; and (5) importance of developing centralized patient support systems outside of treatment decisions. Results improve understanding of how Black/AA patients perceive of TGP and how interventions can be developed to assist with making informed decisions about secondary hereditary results.

Indexed as

Black/African American cancer patientsGeneticsQualitative researchTumor genomic profiling (TGP)

Identifiers

PMID38366313
PMCPMC11217212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.