Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366297›Full record

ArticleAmbio2024

Aligning agri-environmental-climate public good supply and desire in a sustainable Dutch agricultural sector.

Atoesa S Farokhi, Kina S Harmanny, Catharina J E Schulp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atoesa S FarokhiInstitute for Environmental Studies, Environmental Geography Group, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kina S HarmannyInstitute for Environmental Studies, Environmental Geography Group, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Catharina J E SchulpInstitute for Environmental Studies, Environmental Geography Group, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1111, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. nynke.schulp@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5068-8566

Funding

Horizon 2020 817949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

European agricultural policies increasingly incorporate mechanisms for delivery of public goods. Sustainable public good delivery requires alignment between societal demand and landscape supply. However, the variation of demands or desires regarding future public good delivery among society is hardly known. We inventoried the desires for public goods across Dutch society, and projections of agricultural supply. A multi-method approach was used to find agreement levels between desired and expected change in good delivery. Most stakeholders expressed a desire for biodiversity and climate regulation from agriculture, whilst desire for natural heritage and recreation was less common. The utility of a public good to a stakeholder appears to influence its desire. Scenarios for agriculture focus on extensification, sustainable intensification, regionalization, or meadow bird conservation. Regionalized scenarios showed the highest agreement between public good supply and desire. Maximizing alignment between desire and supply thus requires a challenging transition towards region-specific agricultural sustainability strategies.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesBiodiversityClimateClimate ChangeHumansNetherlandsSustainable DevelopmentEcosystem servicesExplorative scenariosPublic goodsStakeholder visionsSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID38366297
PMCPMC11058152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.