ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
A prospective cohort study on perioperative percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia: safety and efficacy analysis.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy analysis of microvascular decompression and percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia secondary to vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: a retrospective cohort study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor: The extracapsular capsule phenomenon of percutaneous balloon compression provides adequate compression of the third branch of the trigeminal nerve: a retrospective study.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Trigeminal neuralgia caused by venous compression: a comprehensive literature review.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
With the recent emergence of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) as a promising treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), there is a growing need for research on its safety and efficacy. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PBC in the treatment of TN patients during the perioperative period. This study involved a total of 400 TN patients who were selected and treated with PBC at our institution. The clinical data and short-term outcomes were analyzed based on sex, initial PBC treatment for TN, and subsequent PBC treatment for recurrent TN after previous PBC or microvascular decompression (MVD) or radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT). No statistically significant difference was found when comparing postoperative pain relief between male and female patients with TN. Nevertheless, female patients were found to be more vulnerable than male patients to abnormal facial sensations (P = 0.001), diplopia (P = 0.015), postoperative headache (P = 0.012), and hyposmia (P = 0.029). Additionally, it was observed that there was no substantial difference in the postoperative pain relief rate between the first-time PBC group and PBC for recurrent TN patients postoperatively following procedures such as PBC, MVD, and RFT. In conclusion, this study has shown that PBC treatment is effective in managing TN in both males and females, regardless of whether the treatment was administered as a primary intervention or following prior surgical procedures such as PBC, MVD, or RFT. Nonetheless, it is noted that the risk of postoperative complications appears to be higher in female patients compared to male patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.