Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366192›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Escherichia coli CRISPR arrays from early life fecal samples preferentially target prophages.

Moïra B Dion, Shiraz A Shah, Ling Deng, Jonathan Thorsen, Jakob Stokholm, Karen A Krogfelt, Susanne Schjørring, Philippe Horvath, Antoine Allard, Dennis S Nielsen and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TheEcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Moïra B DionDépartement de biochimie, de microbiologie, et de bio-informatique, Faculté des sciences et de génie, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Shiraz A ShahCopenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Ledreborg Alle 34, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark.
Ling DengFood Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Jonathan ThorsenCopenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Ledreborg Alle 34, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark.
Jakob StokholmCopenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Ledreborg Alle 34, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark.
Karen A KrogfeltDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300S Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne SchjørringDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300S Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philippe HorvathIFF Danisco, Health & Biosciences, Dangé-Saint-Romain 86220, France.
Antoine AllardDépartement de physique, de génie physique et d'optique, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Dennis S NielsenFood Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Marie-Agnès PetitUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institut Micalis, Jouy-en-Josas 78350, France.
Sylvain MoineauDépartement de biochimie, de microbiologie, et de bio-informatique, Faculté des sciences et de génie, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
University of Copenhagen · DKDépartement d'Informatique · FRGentofte Hospital · DKStatens Serum Institut · DKUniversité Laval · CAUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas systems are defense mechanisms against phages and other nucleic acids that invade bacteria and archaea. In Escherichia coli, it is generally accepted that CRISPR-Cas systems are inactive in laboratory conditions due to a transcriptional repressor. In natural isolates, it has been shown that CRISPR arrays remain stable over the years and that most spacer targets (protospacers) remain unknown. Here, we re-examine CRISPR arrays in natural E. coli isolates and investigate viral and bacterial genomes for spacer targets using a bioinformatics approach coupled to a unique biological dataset. We first sequenced the CRISPR1 array of 1769 E. coli isolates from the fecal samples of 639 children obtained during their first year of life. We built a network with edges between isolates that reflect the number of shared spacers. The isolates grouped into 34 modules. A search for matching spacers in bacterial genomes showed that E. coli spacers almost exclusively target prophages. While we found instances of self-targeting spacers, those involving a prophage and a spacer within the same bacterial genome were rare. The extensive search for matching spacers also expanded the library of known E. coli protospacers to 60%. Altogether, these results favor the concept that E. coli's CRISPR-Cas is an antiprophage system and highlight the importance of reconsidering the criteria use to deem CRISPR-Cas systems active.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesProphagesChildClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialHumansbacteriophageCRISPRE. coligutmicrobiomephagephage resistancevirome

Identifiers

PMID38366192
PMCPMC10910852
OpenAlexW4390858353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.